bookmark_bordera wise Chinese saying ....

A long time ago in Chi­na, a girl named Li-Li got mar­ried & went to live with her hus­band and mother-in-law. In a very short time, Li-Li found that she couldn't get along with her mother-in-law at all. Their per­so­na­li­ties were very dif­fe­rent, and Li-Li was ange­red by many of her mother-in-law's habits. In addi­ti­on, she cri­ti­ci­zed Li-Li constantly.

Days pas­sed and weeks pas­sed. Li-Li and her mother-in-law never stop­ped arguing and fight­ing. But what made the situa­ti­on even worse was that, accor­ding to anci­ent Chi­ne­se tra­di­ti­on, Li-Li had to bow to her mother-in-law and obey her every wish. All the anger and unhap­pi­ness in the hou­se was caus­ing Li-Li's poor hus­band gre­at distress.

Final­ly, Li-Li could not stand her mother-in-law's bad tem­per and dic­ta­tor­ship any lon­ger, and she deci­ded to do some­thing about it. Li-Li went to see her father's good fri­end, Mr. Huang, who sold herbs. She told him the situa­ti­on and asked if he would give her some poi­son so that she could sol­ve the pro­blem once and for all. Mr. Huang thought for a while, and final­ly said, "Li-Li, I will help you sol­ve your pro­blem, but you must listen to me and obey what I tell you."
Li-Li said, "Yes, Mr. Huang, I will do wha­te­ver you tell me to do."

Mr. Huang went into the back room, and retur­ned in a few minu­tes with a packa­ge of herbs. He told Li-Li, "You can't use a quick-acting poi­son to get rid of your mother-in-law, becau­se that would cau­se peo­p­le to beco­me sus­pi­cious. The­r­e­fo­re, I have given you a num­ber of herbs that will slow­ly build up poi­son in her body. Every other day prepa­re some deli­cious meal and put a litt­le of the­se herbs in her ser­ving. Now, in order to make sure that nobo­dy suspect you. When she dies, you must be very careful to act very fri­end­ly towards her. Don't argue with her, obey her every wish, and tre­at her like a queen."

Li-Li was so hap­py. She than­ked Mr. Huang and hur­ried home to start her plot of mur­de­ring her mother-in-law. Weeks went by and months went by, and every other day, Li-Li ser­ved the spe­ci­al­ly trea­ted food to her mother-in-law. She remem­be­red what Mr. Huang had said about avo­i­ding sus­pi­ci­on, so she con­trol­led her tem­per, obey­ed her mother-in-law, and trea­ted her like her own mother. After six months had pas­sed, the who­le hou­se­hold had chan­ged. Li-Li had prac­ti­ced con­trol­ling her tem­per so much that she found that she almost never got mad or upset.

She hadn't had an argu­ment with her mother-in-law in six months becau­se she now see­med much kin­der and easier to get along with. The mother-in-law's atti­tu­de toward Li-Li chan­ged, and she began to love Li-Li like her own daugh­ter. She kept tel­ling fri­ends and rela­ti­ves that Li-Li was the best daugh­ter-in-law one could ever find. Li-Li and her mother-in-law were now trea­ting each other like a real mother and daugh­ter. Li-Li's hus­band was very hap­py to see what was happening.

One day, Li-Li came to see Mr. Huang and asked for his help again. She said, "Dear Mr. Huang, plea­se help me to keep the poi­son from kil­ling my mother-in-law! She's chan­ged into such a nice woman, and I love her like my own mother. I do not want her to die becau­se of the poi­son I gave her."

Mr. Huang smi­led and nod­ded his head. "Li-Li, there's not­hing to worry about. I never gave you any poi­son. The herbs I gave you were herbs to impro­ve her health. The only poi­son was in your mind and your atti­tu­de toward her, but that has been all washed away by the love which you gave to her."

The­re is a wise Chi­ne­se saying:
"The per­son who loves others will also be loved in return."


[via John G.]

bookmark_borderOttos Mops - "Konkrete Poesie" - ein Beispiel ....

Der Herr baron hat's vor­ge­schla­gen - und weil ich das Gedicht auch sehr mag hier ein Hin­weis, wo es in Gän­ze zu fin­den ist ....

Ein paar Zei­len als "Lese­pro­be":

....
otto: komm mops komm
ottos mops kommt
....

Ach ja, und wenn sie schon dabei sind Gedich­te zu lesen - sehen sie doch 'mal HIER oder DA oder DORT nach ....

bookmark_borderSoliloquy oder Soliloquium* ....

oder:
Gespräch mit sich selbst, nicht gleich Monolog!
Ich bin immer wie­der erstaunt dar­über, wie viel es auch im fort­ge­schrit­te­nen Alter noch zu ent­decken und zu ler­nen gibt ....


* "Eine prä­zi­se Bestim­mung des Mono­log ist schwie­rig, da sie nach ver­schie­de­nen Kri­te­ri­en her­aus­ge­ar­bei­tet wer­den kann. Nach einem situa­ti­ven Kri­te­ri­um bei­spiels­wei­se, in dem die Ein­sam­keit des Spre­chers, der sei­ne Replik als Selbst­ge­spräch an kein Gegen­über auf der Büh­ne rich­tet, wären län­ge­re Boten­be­rich­te oder eine gro­ße Rede kei­ne Mono­log, da sie ja an Figu­ren auf der Büh­ne oder an das Publi­kum gerich­tet sind. Nach einem struk­tu­rel­len Kri­te­ri­um, das den Umfang und den in sich geschlos­se­nen Zusam­men­hang einer Replik berück­sich­tigt, wür­de es sich bei die­sen jedoch um Mono­lo­ge han­deln, da sie in sich geschlos­se­ne Solo-Reden grö­ße­ren Umfangs sind (Pfi­ster, 1977). In die­sem Kon­text wird der begriff­li­che Unter­schied der angel­säch­si­schen Fach­ter­mi­no­lo­gie zwi­schen "Soli­lo­quy" und Mono­log beson­ders einleuchtend:
"Der Mono­log unter­schei­det sich vom Dia­log durch sei­ne Län­ge und rela­ti­ve Voll­stän­dig­keit und vom Soli­lo­quy durch die Tat­sa­che, daß er sich an jeman­den wen­det. Das Soli­lo­qui­um wird von einer Per­son gespro­chen, die allein ist oder so tut, als ob sie allein wäre. Es ist eine Art, mit sich selbst zu spre­chen..." (Dic­tion­a­ry of World Lite­ra­tu­re, S. 272)."
[zitiert aus "Thea­ter­be­grif­fe"; Abs.: "Mono­log"]

bookmark_borderWo sie Recht haben ....

haben sie Recht!
Das Bemer­kens­wer­te an den Grü­nen ist die unge­heue­re Band­brei­te ihrer Aktionen:
Von "sehr nütz­lich"
- so wie hier in die­sem Fall
- bis "außer­or­dent­lich unnütz"
- fin­det man wirk­lich ALLES!


[Sto­ry gefun­den im Knast­blog]

bookmark_borderSolidarität mit Dänemark                                                     Meinungsfreiheit ohne Einschränkungen!




[Auf­for­de­rung erfüllt!; Sie­he auch die­se Abhand­lung (Basis: K. Tuchol­ski) und "Kari­ka­tu­ren ...." v. 01-02-2006]


Zu die­sem The­ma bekam ich Post von einem Freund aus USA.
Dort zir­ku­liert fol­gen­der Text (Aus­zug):
Come on, is this real­ly about car­toons? Mus­lims are ram­pa­ging and bur­ning flags. They're loo­king for Euro­peans to kid­nap. They're threa­tening inn­kee­pers and gene­ral­ly rai­sing Mus­lim hell not becau­se of any outra­ge over a car­toon. They're outra­ged becau­se it is part of their Isla­mic jiha­dist cul­tu­re to be outra­ged. They don't real­ly need a rea­son. They just need an excu­se. Wan­de­ring around destroy­ing pro­per­ty, mur­de­ring child­ren, firing guns into the air and feig­ning outra­ge over the sligh­test per­cei­ved insult is to a jiha­dist what tail­ga­ting is to a foot­ball fan – its part of the sport.
We know and under­stand that the­se bloodthirsty mur­de­rers do not repre­sent the majo­ri­ty of the world's Mus­lims. When, though, do the “nice” Mus­lims beco­me outra­ged? When do they take to the streets to express their outra­ge at the radi­cals who are making their reli­gi­on the object of world­wi­de hat­red and ridi­cu­le? When do the nice inmans preach to their masses that vio­lence is not civi­li­zed beha­vi­or, that no Mus­lim should be vio­lent or extre­me becau­se it is in fact against their Isla­mic reli­gi­on to do so, that Moham­med frowns upon tho­se who do, and they should repu­dia­te any Mus­lim who does? Isla­mic wri­ter Sal­man Rush­die wro­te of the­se silent nice Mus­lims in a New York Times artic­le three years ago. He said: "As their anci­ent, deep­ly civi­li­zed cul­tu­re of love, art and phi­lo­so­phi­cal reflec­tion is hijacked by para­noiacs, racists, liars, male supre­macists, tyrants, fana­tics and vio­lence jun­kies, why are they not screaming?"
Inde­ed, why are they not? The nice Mus­lims cer­tain­ly have a bet­ter chan­ce than Wester­ners do to stop the beha­vi­or of the extre­mist Mus­lims. But they are silent.
Um kein Öl ins Feu­er zu gie­ßen habe ich eini­ge Pas­sa­gen herausgenommen ....

bookmark_borderWozu ....

eine Zahn­ex­trak­ti­on gut sein kann ist schnell gesagt:

Seit jenem Tag habe ich kei­ne Ziga­ret­te mehr angefaßt!

Nicht­rau­cher - einer mehr.

Dazu paßt eine Mel­dung in der heu­ti­gen Pres­se zum Ver­brauch von Fein­schnitt, der übli­cher­wei­se zum Ziga­ret­tendre­hen benutzt wird: Stei­ge­rungs­ra­te* ca. 100% seit 2002.


*

  • 2002: 15,5 Tsd Ton­nen / Ziga­ret­ten: 145 Mrd. Stück;
  • 2003: 18,6 Tsd Ton­nen / Ziga­ret­ten: 132 Mrd. Stück;
  • 2004: 24,3 Tsd Ton­nen / Ziga­ret­ten: 111 Mrd. Stück;
  • 2005: 33,2 Tsd Ton­nen / Ziga­ret­ten: 096 Mrd. Stück.