Sortiert nach

×

bookmark_borderDON'T MESS WITH OLD PEOPLE ....

Harold was an old man. He was sick and in the hospital.
The­re was one young nur­se that just dro­ve him crazy.

Every time she came in, she would talk to him like he was a litt­le child. She would say in a patro­ni­zing tone of voice, "And how are we doing this mor­ning, or are we rea­dy for a bath, or are we hungry?"

Old Harold had had enough of this par­ti­cu­lar nur­se. One day, Old Harold had break­fast, pul­led the juice off the tray, and put it on his bed side stand. He had been given a uri­ne bot­t­le to fill for testing.

The juice was apple juice. So you know whe­re the juice went! The nur­se came in a litt­le later, picked up the uri­ne bot­t­le and loo­ked at it. "My, but it seems we are a litt­le clou­dy today "

At this, Old Harold snat­ched the bot­t­le out of her hand, pop­ped off the top, and drank it down, say­ing, "Well, I'll run it through again. May­be I can fil­ter it bet­ter this time."

The nur­se fain­ted! Old Harold just smiled!

So remem­ber:
DON'T MESS WITH OLD PEOPLE!


[via John G.]

bookmark_borderSerientäter .... (I)

zum Jah­res­auf­takt ....

(1) Serie "Nach­ge­dacht" / 18 Beiträge

  1. Chi­na
  2. Wohl­tä­tig­keit
  3. Rei­sen bildet
  4. e-Mail & Inhalte
  5. Kin­der­se­gen
  6. Schrei­ben & Rechnen
  7. mobil tele­fo­nie­ren
  8. Ban­kiers-Ehre
  9. Stu­den­ten­ver­sa­gen
  10. Tex­ti­li­en & Qualität
  11. Gast­freund­schaft
  12. Ehr­be­griff
  13. Alko­hol
  14. Medi­zi­ner
  15. Schnäpp­chen
  16. Sex
  17. Recht
  18. Exper­ten

bookmark_borderNoch einer ....

Donald Rums­feld is giving Pre­si­dent Bush his dai­ly briefing.
He con­clu­des by saying:
"Yester­day, 3 Bra­zi­li­an sol­diers were kil­led in Iraq."

"OH NO!"

the Pre­si­dent exclaims.
"That's ter­ri­ble!"

His staff sits stun­ned at this dis­play of emotion,
ner­vous­ly watching as the pre­si­dent sits,
head in hands.

Final­ly, the Pre­si­dent looks up and asks..........
''How many is a brazillion ??!"

bookmark_borderEin Freund ....

aus USA schickt mit fol­gen­den "Witz" - mit der Bemerkung
" .. Here's one that expres­ses some of my endu­ring feelings. .. "

A dri­ver is stuck in a traf­fic jam on the highway.
Not­hing is moving.
Sud­den­ly a man knocks on the window.
The dri­ver rolls down his win­dow and asks,
"What hap­pen­ed?"

"Ter­ro­rists kid­nap­ped Pre­si­dent Bush and are asking for a $10 bil­li­on ran­som. Other­wi­se they are going to dou­se him with gaso­li­ne and set him on fire.
We are going from car to car taking up a collection."

The dri­ver asks,
"How much is ever­yo­ne giving on average?"

"About a gallon."

bookmark_borderWeitergedacht .... (9)



Wenn ein Blog­ger "Hei­di Klum" oder "Coca­Co­la"
oder "Vako­na" oder "Sozi­al­ge­richt Bre­men"
in sei­nem Web­log nennt ist das erlaubt.

Sich aber als die genann­te Insti­tu­ti­on, die Fir­ma oder die Per­son aus­zu­ge­ben ist nicht erlaubt. Ich mache mir da also auch wegen der Fir­ma Klu­te Rei­sen, Osna­brück, wenig Sorgen.
Aber eini­ge Blog­ger soll­ten schon 'mal dar­über nach­den­ken, was Herr Vet­ter in sei­nem Web­log dazu sagt ....


[9 Bild-Quel­le]


Zitat aus dem Bei­trag von Herrn Vet­ter:
" ..Gebrauch meint viel­mehr eine Ver­let­zung des Namens­rechts. Zum Bei­spiel in Form von .. Namens­an­ma­ßung, Gebrauch zur Bezeich­nung der eige­nen Per­son .. oder Gebrauch eines glei­chen Namens... "


Soll­te es - wie vor­ge­schla­gen - zu einer "Blog­ger-Rechts­schutz-Ver­si­che­rung" kom­men bin ich dabei ....