Für Bewer­bungs­ge­sprä­che gel­ten bestimm­te Regeln. Meist hal­ten sich die Kan­di­da­ten dar­an - manch­mal auch nicht .... ob das aus Unwis­sen­heit oder mit Absicht geschieht läßt sich nicht immer sagen .... Eine jüngst ver­öf­fent­lich­te Liste stellt eini­ge die­ser "No-no's" zusam­men .... könn­te hier nicht pas­sie­ren? Doch, ganz bestimmt!

[Zitat] " .. the top .. most outra­ge­ous mista­kes were: 

• Can­di­da­te ans­we­red cell pho­ne and asked the inter­view­er to lea­ve her own office becau­se it was a "pri­va­te" conversation. 
• Can­di­da­te asked the inter­view­er for a ride home after the interview. 
• Can­di­da­te smel­led his arm­pits on the way to the inter­view room. 
• Can­di­da­te said she could not pro­vi­de a wri­ting sam­ple becau­se all of her wri­ting had been for the CIA and it was "clas­si­fi­ed".
• When an appli­cant was offe­red food befo­re the inter­view, he declined say­ing he didn't want to line his sto­mach with grea­se befo­re going out drinking. 
• A can­di­da­te for an accoun­ting posi­ti­on said she was a "peo­p­le per­son" not a "num­bers person". 
• Can­di­da­te flus­hed the toi­let while tal­king to inter­view­er during pho­ne interview. 
• Can­di­da­te took out a hair brush and brushed her hair.

[/Zitat]

Wei­ter Feh­ler (Häu­fig­keit in % in Klammern) 

• Unpas­sen­de Beklei­dung (51)
• Anschwär­zen des letz­ten Arbeit­ge­bers (49)
• Bewer­ber erscheint unin­ter­es­siert (48)

[ 3.082 / cdz ]